The APG Summoner class is explicitly banned (for new PCs). says above and only choose what's on both lists at the same cost, which admittedly is what I'll likely do.) GM 2 says he can't because nowhere does it say his PC can access UC evolutions. GM 1 says he can't because the APG Summoner is no longer allowed as a class.īob then uses UC Summoner evolutions. Player Bob makes a Primal Hunter, it's legal.īob goes to select APG Summoner evolutions. Is that an official wording because they aren't at all consistent with it when it comes to archetypes that uses banned material? Otherwise you are saying 'evolution legalities can be bypassed taking a class other than summoner that grants evolutions.' Which means that the Primal hunter can take racial evolutions.

Other legal rules would need to contain text saying the bypassed the legality issues. Rangers can use multi attack because bestiary has this language:įeats: none of the feats are legal for play for PCs, animal companions, or familiars unless specifically granted by another legal source

'Aasimars: all alternate racial traits, favored class options, racial archetypes, racial equipment, feats, magic items, and spells are legal for play' Just because you can't normally play with it doesn't stop other legal rules from using it still.Īasimar options are explicitly legal for play. Or like how multi-attack as a monster feat isn't legal for PC's, unless they get it legally through ranger class. You cannot PLAY a summoner, but that doesn't make the the material a non legal source if you gain it in a legal way. It's because there are ways to legally get around the rule of play. Aasimars and their options are legal even though aasimars aren't legal for play.

Primal hunter barbarian pathfinder